ACT NOW
Write a review
Terms & Conditions
Write a Review & Win Career Coaching
Complete one or more product and/or service provider reviews for a chance to win sessions with renowned executive career coach Cindy Kraft.

"Change in control" of an entity and Share based payments (FAS 123R)

User's Picture
Posted Wed, 10/21/2009 - 4:17pm by Sunil Thukral (Technical Accounting/Rep)

Details

When do you accrue the liability for the share based payment awards (i.e. restricted share units (RSU) / performance share units (PSU)) if the RSU/PSU units are vested due to change in control provision. Is it based on the change of control date (assume February 28, 20X1) OR can an entity accrue the liability on the date it is "probable" that the payout would be made (assume December 31, 20XX)?

  • Change of Control Agreements
  • Fully Vested Retirement Plan
  • 643 reads

Comments

User's Picture

That sounds like facts and circumstances...

by Mark Stokes (CFO) - 10/22/2009 - 12:00pm

I can see that going either way based on just how probable the transaction is. Probable is one of those words that should be banned from accounting - it's just too loose. Who determines what "probable" means in each case? Does it make it better if your auditor agrees that an event is probable? This is a great case to ask about b/c deals can and often do fall apart at the eleventh hour. Thus, facts and circumstances will lead you to make a decision based on your best judgment of the risk of not reporting a material liability vs. the probability that an event won't happen.

You must register or login for full access
User's Picture

Who said that accounting was black and white?

by Sunil Thukral (Technical Accounting/Rep) - 10/22/2009 - 1:23pm

Hi Mark,

Thanks for your comments. If accunting was really black and white, we would not have "probable" included in GAAP. :-)

Anyone else in the group who has encountered this situation before?

Regards,
Sunil

You must register or login for full access