So, a finance team puts in $750k and is 8 months into the implementation with a big vendor. The team meets with the vendor’s project manager to discuss the status and asks the vendor about promised functionality. The vendor replies,
“That might be what sales told you, but I’m telling you what we CAN do.” -Anonymous Big Vendor Project Manager
And it turns out it wasn’t enough. This particular finance team cut off the project and implemented a smaller vendor’s solution. Not only was the smaller vendor faster and cheaper, but the little’ guy’s software actually did the things the sales team promised. The little guy came out on top!
Is big-vendor
-
Big vendor wins: $750k in revenue
-
Small vendor wins: $100 – $200k in revenue
-
Customer loses: $750k + cost of wasted personnel time… ZERO bang, lots of bucks
I’m sure there’s some truth to the old axiom, “No one ever got fired for buying IBM”, but is anyone really losing their job these days for buying more affordable software solutions from smaller vendors?
-
What if there was a small vendor with a track record of success with large companies?
-
What if you could mitigate risk and deliver value without dependence on the vendor or your IT team?
I’ve seen hints of big vendor risk over the last 15 years. As finance professionals, I think it’s time we get the clue. Nearly all analysts and pundits covering planning software see the benefits of going small when it comes to software. The real problem is senior
By now, we all know it takes longer to build models with big vendor software. We all know IT is often required to make even the most basic change to a driver assumption or modeled relationship. Many of us have built models in one platform only to see our modeling environment sunsetted and replaced by whatever new software solution the big vendor decides to acquire. I just read a recent press release from a little guy trying to migrate existing big vendor customers to their small vendor solution. It’s no wonder that small vendors tend to appear at the top of the list on surveys ranking software solutions. I think IBM Cognos may have scored the highest score out of all big vendors with a 4.19 out of 5 on a recent survey. Customers consistently rate small vendors such as AxiomEPM and Tagetik higher than their big vendor counterparts.
In Big Vendors, Big Risk, Rob Lautt, a small-vendor CEO, describes 3 key reasons why small vendors tend to be better than bigger vendors for corporate performance management:
#1: Better product, better solution.
#2: Higher quality service, personalized attention
#3: Lower total cost of ownership (TCO). Higher ROI.
I invite you to share your personal experiences with small and/or big vendors in the Corporate Performance Management (CPM) space. You may want to use these 3 benefit areas as inspiration. Let’s stand up against big vendors and large-scale software deployment failures and get back to meaningful and impactful work!