more-arw search

Q&A Forum

Compliance programs, proposed revision to federal sentencing guidelines

The following is a link to a brief discussion about the proposed changes to the federal sentencing guidelines, and why it would benefit corporations to have sufficient compliance programs.  I am not associated with the people who wrote the materials, but I assume them to be correct.

Dave Tate, Esq.

Reference URL:


J. Ed Neufer CPA
Title: Consultant
(Consultant, CONSULTING) |

This is interesting. Seems the current guidelines of prohibiting the penalty reduction if an individual "participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense" is a good thing. No one person should get a free or reduced pass for breaking the law, especially willfully, and a company with knowledge that does nothing about it seems to be guilty as well.

An improvement seems to be allowing compliance direct access and reporting to the Board, especially if it keeps rogue individuals, or groups of individuals, from conducting illegal activities while certain management look the other way.

Think most people try to resolve matters through other means, like negotiation, contact with law enforcement, attorneys, etc. But then sometimes it seems things continue with no satisfactory results. So what are victims to do but try to reach out to anyone who will listen to resolve major problems?



Get Free Membership

By signing up, you will receive emails from Proformative regarding Proformative programs, events, community news and activity. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact Us.

Business Exchange

Browse the Business Exchange to find information, resources and peer reviews to help you select the right solution for your business.

Learn more

Contribute to Community

If you’re interested in learning more about contributing to your Proformative community, we have many ways for you to get involved. Please email to learn more about becoming a speaker or contributing to the blogs/Q&A Forum.