more-arw search

Q&A Forum

Performance Evaluation Best Practices

I was curious to gain some insight as to what others use as annual reviews and maybe share some best practices. I have seen annual reviews based on performance, based on peer reviews (360 Evaluation), based on behaviors etc. What do you all find is the best method to provide the most meaningful feedback to the person?


(VP - FInancial Planning and Analysis) |

The annual review should be brief and non-confrontational. The reason for this is feedback should be ongoing. Nothing should come as a surprise to the person being reviewed. Feedback should be part of the company culture of running the business day to day. However, to make this effective the reviewer cannot be too far removed from the individual being evaluated. It is important to delegate responsibility for reviewing performance and have confidence that it will be handled in a fair and dignified manner.

(Chief Financial Officer) |

It should also be actionable, showing clearly areas for improvement. A manager that avoids needed confrontation should not be managing people. Too many people leave reviews with ambiguity about their performance.

(VP - FInancial Planning and Analysis) |

My point about being non-confrontational is that it should have been taking place ongoing. It should not all of a sudden be an issue during an annual review. I certainly was not suggesting that confrontation be avoided. I agree that is part of managing people.

Title: CFO
Company: C-Suite Services
LinkedIn Profile
(CFO, C-Suite Services) |

If you are open to cultural change, research about OKRs (Objectives and Key Results).

(Accountant) |

The most important for performance evaluation are assumptions. If you define them clearly for the manager and also for evaluated employee it is going to be quite simple process with huge outcomes. I see outcomes mainly for people conducted or somehow engaged in the process.

So and which assumptions you should firstly define:
1. what is core business of organization (if I have bookkeeper in accounting company - his responsibility is different from bookkeeper in manufacturing company).
2. purpose of evaluation (what does it mean for manager, for employee, for whole organization, for co-worker and so on),

there are maybe other assumptions but It also depends on different type of company. And every company should find their own one the most important. But communication should be remain stable.

Sandra Habiger
Title: Project/Financial Analyst
Company: Alliance Enterprises, Inc
(Project/Financial Analyst, Alliance Enterprises, Inc) |

Our annual evaluations for employees is a 360 degrees kind of a review and consist of four parts: The first part lists and describes three accomplishments during the review period. The employee fills out the section. The second part is performance rating with two columns for self and manager rating. It's based on a 3 points scale where 1 is weakness, 2 is mostly and 3 is strength. Some of the items on the list are: takes responsibility for actions and results, works to the best of abilities, is viewed as trustworthy in word and deed, etc. The third part consist of a Start, Stop, Keep section that compiles peer reviews that were submited anonymously via Formrouter. Things that could be listed are: Start - coming to meetings on time, Stop: texting during meetings, Keep: smiling. It brightens up everyone during stressful deadlines. The fourth part is an overall rating completed by the manager. The manager can choose from a drop-down list between Meets expectations, marginally meets expectations, does not meet expectations. Each manager meets with the employee to talk about the evaluations (for example, we talk about any differences between the managers and employees rating in the second part). During the meeting, the manager and employee also talks about the overall satisfaction with the job, if there is anything else that the employee would like to do or learn.

(Board Advisor and Investor) |

best performance reviews are often and actionable. Waiting til year end for a review is not timely, lacks reinforcement. I find weekly or monthly 1:1's with key staff where I provide feedback and recommendations on actions that everyone still remembers is best. And the annual review is just a summary of those mtgs from the past year. Usually there is no surprise at the rating and compensation adjustment. Poor performers got the message long time ago and already gone. The high performers received positive reinforcement and recommendations for further improvement throughout the year.

Michelle Rogers
Title: CEO
Company: Virtually There CFO Services
(CEO, Virtually There CFO Services) |

Great comments from the group. Agreed that feedback should be ongoing and not limited to corrections but praise for things done well. A simple format that I like to use is to have a regular 'start, stop, and keep' conversation where feedback is provided to the employee on what they should start doing, stop doing and keep doing. It provides a balanced approach, requires the reviewer to come up with positives and improvements and, if incorporated into a regular meeting schedule, is generally accepted by the employee as a positive mechanism for feedback.

As with anything, communication is key. And, clarity of expectations - what 'good' looks like - is a powerful tool to helping an employee succeed in their role. When employees feel successful, they are far more productive and happy.


Get Free Membership

By signing up, you will receive emails from Proformative regarding Proformative programs, events, community news and activity. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact Us.

Business Exchange

Browse the Business Exchange to find information, resources and peer reviews to help you select the right solution for your business.

Learn more

Contribute to Community

If you’re interested in learning more about contributing to your Proformative community, we have many ways for you to get involved. Please email [email protected] to learn more about becoming a speaker or contributing to the blogs/Q&A Forum.